Comment on ``Muon-spin rotation studies of the superconducting properties of Mo_3Sb_7'', Phys.Rev.B 78, 172505 (2008)
R. Khasanov, P.W. Klamut, A. Shengelaya, I.M. Savi\'c, C. Baines, and, H. Keller

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous muon-spin rotation study claiming two gaps in Mo_3Sb_7, arguing that the data actually supports a single-gap superconducting model based on analysis inconsistencies.
Contribution
It challenges prior claims of two-gap superconductivity in Mo_3Sb_7 by reanalyzing muSR and specific heat data, supporting a single-gap interpretation.
Findings
Previous muSR analysis is insufficient to confirm two gaps.
Specific heat data aligns with a single-gap model.
Both muSR and heat capacity data are consistent with one-gap superconductivity.
Abstract
In a recent article Tran et al. [Phys. Rev.B 78, 172505 (2008)] report on the result of the muon-spin rotation (\muSR) measurements of Mo_3Sb_7 superconductor. Based on the analysis of the temperature and the magnetic field dependence of the Gaussian relaxation rate \sigma_{sc} they suggest that Mo_3Sb_7 is the superconductor with two isotropic s-wave like gaps. An additional confirmation was obtained from the specific heat data published earlier by partly the same group of authors in [Acta Mater. 56, 5694 (2008)]. The purpose of this Comment is to point out that from the analysis made by Tran et al. the presence of two superconducting energy gaps in Mo_3Sb_7 can not be justified. The analysis of \muSR data does not account for the reduction of \sigma_{sc} with increasing temperature, and, hence, yields inaccurate information on the magnetic penetration depth. The specific heat data can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
