The Repressor-Lattice: Feed-Back, Commensurability, and Dynamical Frustration
Mogens H. Jensen, Sandeep Krishna, Simone Pigolotti

TL;DR
This paper models a lattice of gene repressors to explore how feedback loops and system size influence oscillatory behavior and the emergence of chaotic, frustrated states, with implications for biological tissues.
Contribution
It introduces a novel hexagonal lattice model of repressilators, analyzing how symmetry, size, and interaction strength affect dynamics and frustration.
Findings
Non-frustrated oscillations with three phases are possible.
System size influences the number of oscillating phases.
Increasing interaction strength leads to symmetry-breaking and chaos.
Abstract
A repressilator consists of a loop made up of three repressively interacting genes. We construct a hexagonal lattice with repressilators on each triangle, and use this as a model system for multiple interacting feedback loops. Using symmetry arguments and stability analysis we argue that the repressor-lattice can be in a non-frustrated oscillating state with only three distinct phases. If the system size is not commensurate with three, oscillating solutions of several different phases are possible. As the strength of the interactions between the nodes increases, the system undergoes many transitions, breaking several symmetries. Eventually dynamical frustrated states appear, where the temporal evolution is chaotic, even though there are no built-in frustrations. Applications of the repressor-lattice to real biological systems, such as tissues or biofilms, are discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
