Relational Motivation for Conformal Operator Ordering in Quantum Cosmology
Edward Anderson

TL;DR
This paper explores the origin of conformal invariance in operator ordering within quantum cosmology, linking it to relationalist actions and emergent time, thereby providing a new perspective on the formal and physical implications of operator ordering choices.
Contribution
It identifies the Lagrangian origin of conformal invariance in quantum cosmology and connects it to relationalist actions and emergent time, offering a novel understanding of operator ordering.
Findings
Conformal invariance is rooted in the Lagrangian structure of relationalist actions.
Relationalist actions naturally implement conformal scaling, strengthening the motivation for conformal operator ordering.
The conformal scaling of emergent time relates to simplifications in equations of motion and geodesic parametrizations.
Abstract
Operator-ordering in quantum cosmology is a major as-yet unsettled ambiguity with not only formal but also physical consequences. We determine the Lagrangian origin of the conformal invariance that underlies the conformal operator-ordering choice in quantum cosmology. It is particularly naturally and simply manifest in relationalist product-type actions (such as the Jacobi action for mechanics or Baierlein-Sharp-Wheeler type actions for general relativity), for which all that is required for the kinetic and potential factors to rescale in compensation to each other. These actions themselves mathematically sharply implementing philosophical principles relevant to whole-universe modelling, the motivation for conformal operator-ordering in quantum cosmology is substantially strengthened. Relationalist product-type actions also give emergent times which amount to recovering Newtonian,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
