TL;DR
This paper critically examines the limitations of popular citation indices by comparing impact factors across Russian journals, highlighting their deficiencies in accurately measuring journal impact.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of impact factors for Russian journals, revealing shortcomings of existing citation metrics.
Findings
Citation indices have significant deficiencies.
Russian journals' impact factors vary widely.
Current metrics may not accurately reflect journal quality.
Abstract
Comparison between the various impact factors of a few Russian journals demonstrates the deficiencies of the popular citation indices.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Physics and Python Applications