TL;DR
This paper reviews various conventions for defining B(E2) transition probabilities in nuclear physics, clarifying differences and implications for consistent communication.
Contribution
It systematically compares different conventions for B(E2) definitions, highlighting their differences and guiding proper usage in research.
Findings
Clarification of convention differences
Guidance for consistent B(E2) reporting
Implications for nuclear structure studies
Abstract
We discuss different conventions used for defining B(E2)'s.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Polynomial and algebraic computation · Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods