Accuracy of Quasicontinuum Approximations Near Instabilities
Matthew Dobson, Mitchell Luskin, and Christoph Ortner

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the stability of quasicontinuum approximations near lattice instabilities, demonstrating that certain methods accurately predict stability while others incorrectly forecast early failure, through rigorous analysis and numerical tests.
Contribution
It provides the first rigorous stability estimates for quasicontinuum methods near instabilities, highlighting the accuracy of the quasi-nonlocal approach versus the inaccuracies of energy-based QC.
Findings
Quasi-nonlocal QC reproduces atomistic stability accurately.
Energy-based QC predicts instability prematurely.
Analytic criterion for stability prediction derived.
Abstract
The formation and motion of lattice defects such as cracks, dislocations, or grain boundaries, occurs when the lattice configuration loses stability, that is, when an eigenvalue of the Hessian of the lattice energy functional becomes negative. When the atomistic energy is approximated by a hybrid energy that couples atomistic and continuum models, the accuracy of the approximation can only be guaranteed near deformations where both the atomistic energy as well as the hybrid energy are stable. We propose, therefore, that it is essential for the evaluation of the predictive capability of atomistic-to-continuum coupling methods near instabilities that a theoretical analysis be performed, at least for some representative model problems, that determines whether the hybrid energies remain stable {\em up to the onset of instability of the atomistic energy}. We formulate a one-dimensional model…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
