The Galaxy Major Merger Fraction to z ~ 1
C. L\'opez-Sanjuan (1), M. Balcells (1), P. G. P\'erez-Gonz\'alez (2),, G. Barro (2), C. E. Garc\'ia-Dab\'o (1,3), J. Gallego (2), J. Zamorano (2), ((1) IAC, Spain, (2) UCM, Spain, (3) ESO-Garching, Germany)

TL;DR
This study measures the major merger fraction of galaxies up to redshift 1, finding it to be low and suggesting mergers are not the dominant evolutionary process for massive galaxies since z ~ 1.
Contribution
It provides a systematic analysis of galaxy merger fractions up to z ~ 1, incorporating morphological corrections and error considerations to refine merger rate estimates.
Findings
Merger fraction below 6% up to z ~ 1.
Merger rate evolves as (1+z)^3.3 to 3.5.
Only about 8% of massive galaxies have undergone a major merger since z ~ 1.
Abstract
Aims: We study the major merger fraction in a SPITZER/IRAC-selected catalogue in the GOODS-S field up to z ~ 1 for luminosity- and mass-limited samples. Methods: We select disc-disc merger remnants on the basis of morphological asymmetries, and address three main sources of systematic errors: (i) we explicitly apply morphological K-corrections, (ii) we measure asymmetries in galaxies artificially redshifted to z_d = 1.0 to deal with loss of morphological information with redshift, and (iii) we take into account the observational errors in z and A, which tend to overestimate the merger fraction, though use of maximum likelihood techniques. Results: We obtain morphological merger fractions (f_m) below 0.06 up to z ~ 1. Parameterizing the merger fraction evolution with redshift as f_m(z) = f_m(0) (1+z)^m, we find that m = 1.8 +/- 0.5 for M_B <= -20 galaxies, while m = 5.4 +/- 0.4 for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
