Hierarchical star formation in the Milky Way disk

TL;DR

This paper investigates hierarchical star formation in the Milky Way disk, revealing that star formation duration correlates with region size and is nearly 1 Myr when accounting for cluster dissolution effects.

Contribution

It provides new insights into the scaling of star formation timescales and the impact of cluster dissolution on observed age differences in star clusters.

Findings

Age difference scales with separation as ~0.4 power after corrections.

Characteristic star formation timescale is nearly 1 Myr.

Young clusters within 30 pc likely share a common origin.

Abstract

Hierarchical star formation leads to a progressive decrease in the clustering of star clusters both in terms of spatial scale and age. Consistently, the statistical analysis of positions and ages of clusters in the Milky Way disk strongly suggests that a correlation between the duration of star formation in a region and its size does exist. The average age difference between pairs of open clusters increases with their separation as the ~0.16 power. In contrast and for the Large Magellanic Cloud, Efremov & Elmegreen (1998) found that the age difference scales with the ~0.35 power of the region size. This discrepancy may be tentatively interpreted as an argument in support of intrinsically shorter (faster) star formation time-scales in smaller galaxies. However, if both the effects of cluster dissolution and incompleteness are taken into consideration, the average age difference between cluster pairs in the Galaxy increases with their separation as the ~0.4 power. This result implies that the characteristic time-scale for coherent, clustered-mode star formation is nearly 1 Myr. Therefore, the overall consequence of ignoring the effect of cluster dissolution is to overestimate the star formation time-scale. On the other hand, in the Galactic disk and for young clusters separated by less than three times the characteristic cluster tidal radius (10 pc), the average age difference is 16 Myr, which suggests common origin. (Abridged)