Growing the first bright quasars in cosmological simulations of structure formation
Debora Sijacki (1), Volker Springel (2), and Martin G. Haehnelt (1), ((1) Kavli Institute for Cosmology, Cambridge, Institute of Astronomy,, University of Cambridge, (2) Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics, Garching)

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological hydrodynamical simulations to demonstrate that supermassive black holes can grow rapidly enough by redshift 6 to match observed quasars, considering effects of mergers, feedback, and gravitational wave recoils.
Contribution
It presents a high-resolution simulation framework showing how massive black holes can form and grow by z=6, incorporating realistic physics and recoil effects, which was not previously demonstrated.
Findings
Supermassive black holes can reach observed masses by z=6 through extended Eddington-limited accretion.
Black hole mergers and spins influence growth, with mergers aiding mass buildup and high spins potentially hindering it.
Recoil effects can expel low-mass black holes but do not prevent the formation of supermassive black holes.
Abstract
We employ cosmological hydrodynamical simulations to study the growth of massive black holes (BHs) at high redshifts subject to BH merger recoils from gravitational wave emission. We select the most massive dark matter halo at z=6 from the Millennium simulation, and resimulate its formation at much higher resolution including gas physics and a model for BH seeding, growth and feedback. Assuming that the initial BH seeds are relatively massive, of the order of 10^5 Msun, and that seeding occurs around z~15 in dark matter haloes of mass 10^9-10^10 Msun, we find that it is possible to build up supermassive BHs (SMBHs) by z=6 that assemble most of their mass during extended Eddington-limited accretion periods. The properties of the simulated SMBHs are consistent with observations of z=6 quasars in terms of the estimated BH masses and bolometric luminosities, the amount of star formation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
