Investigation of Systematic Bias in Radiometric Diameter Determination of Near-Earth Asteroids: the Night Emission Simulated Thermal Model (NESTM)
Stephen D. Wolters, Simon F. Green

TL;DR
This paper examines biases in the Near-Earth Asteroid Thermal Model (NEATM) caused by assumptions about night-side emission and introduces the NESTM model to improve diameter estimates, especially at large phase angles.
Contribution
The paper introduces the Night Emission Simulated Thermal Model (NESTM), which accounts for night-side emission based on thermal inertia, reducing systematic biases in asteroid diameter estimation.
Findings
NEATM overestimates diameters at large phase angles.
NESTM reduces bias in diameter estimates compared to NEATM.
Adopting NESTM with thermal inertia=200 improves accuracy.
Abstract
The Near-Earth Asteroid Thermal Model (NEATM, Harris, 1998) has proven to be a reliable simple thermal model for radiometric diameter determination. However NEATM assumes zero thermal emission on the night side of an asteroid. We investigate how this assumption affects the best-fit beaming parameter, overestimates the effective diameter and underestimates the albedo at large phase angles, by testing NEATM on thermal IR fluxes generated from simulated asteroid surfaces with different thermal inertia. We compare NEATM to radar diameters and find that NEATM overestimates the diameter when the beaming parameter is fitted to multi-wavelength observations and underestimates the diameter when the default beaming parameter is used. The Night Emission Simulated Thermal Model (NESTM) is introduced. NESTM models the night side temperature as an iso-latitudinal fraction (f) of the maximum day side…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
