Why the usual candidates of reducibility do not work for the symmetric $\lambda\mu$-calculus
Ren\'e David (LAMA), Karim Nour (LAMA)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of traditional reducibility candidates in the symmetric $mbda ext{ extmu}$-calculus and establishes a standardization theorem for it.
Contribution
It demonstrates why standard reducibility techniques fail for the symmetric $mbda ext{ extmu}$-calculus and provides a standardization result for this calculus.
Findings
Usual reducibility candidates are ineffective for the symmetric $mbda ext{ extmu}$-calculus.
A standardization theorem is proven for the symmetric $mbda ext{ extmu}$-calculus.
Examples illustrate the failure of existing reducibility techniques.
Abstract
The symmetric -calculus is the -calculus introduced by Parigot in which the reduction rule , which is the symmetric of , is added. We give examples explaining why the technique using the usual candidates of reducibility does not work. We also prove a standardization theorem for this calculus.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
