On the Temperature Dependence of the Casimir Force for Bulk Lossy Media
V.A. Yampol'skii, Sergey Savel'ev, Z.A. Mayselis, S.S. Apostolov, and, Franco Nori

TL;DR
This paper examines the limitations of the Lifshitz formula in describing how the Casimir force between lossy metals depends on temperature, emphasizing the importance of sample size and wavelength considerations.
Contribution
It identifies the conditions under which the Lifshitz theory fails due to finite sample sizes, clarifying the temperature dependence of the Casimir force in realistic scenarios.
Findings
Lifshitz's theory is invalid when fluctuation wavelengths exceed sample sizes.
Linearly decreasing temperature dependence occurs only in large or dirty samples at high temperatures.
The study resolves the inconsistency with the Nernst theorem by clarifying the limits of the linear dependence.
Abstract
We discuss the limitations of the applicability of the Lifshitz formula to describe the temperature dependence of the Casimir force between two bulk lossy metals. These limitations follow from the finite sizes of the interacting bodies. Namely, Lifshitz's theory is not applicable when the characteristic wavelengths of the fluctuating fields, responsible for the temperature-dependent terms in the Casimir force, is longer than the sizes of the samples. As a result of this, the widely discussed linearly decreasing temperature dependence of the Casimir force can be observed only for dirty and/or large metal samples at high enough temperatures. This solves the problem of the inconsistency between the Nernst theorem and the "linearly decreasing temperature dependence" of the Casimir free energy, because this linear dependence is not valid when
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
