Observational Limits on Type 1 AGN Accretion Rate in COSMOS
Jonathan R. Trump, Chris D. Impey, Brandon C. Kelly, Martin Elvis,, Andrea Merloni, Angela Bongiorno, Jared Gabor, Heng Hao, Patrick J. McCarthy,, John P. Huchra, Marcella Brusa, Nico Cappelluti, Anton Koekemoer, Tohru, Nagao, Mara Salvato, and Nick Z. Scoville

TL;DR
This study analyzes black hole masses and accretion rates for 182 Type 1 AGN in COSMOS, revealing most accrete near 10% of the Eddington limit and highlighting observational biases at lower accretion rates.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale measurement of accretion rates for Type 1 AGN across a broad redshift range, emphasizing the narrow range of Eddington ratios and observational limitations.
Findings
Most Type 1 AGN accrete near 0.1 L_Edd
Survey sensitivity drops below 0.01 L_Edd due to obscuration or dilution
COSMOS detects a wider range of low accretion rate AGN than previous surveys
Abstract
We present black hole masses and accretion rates for 182 Type 1 AGN in COSMOS. We estimate masses using the scaling relations for the broad Hb, MgII, and CIV emission lines in the redshift ranges 0.16<z<0.88, 1<z<2.4, and 2.7<z<4.9. We estimate the accretion rate using an Eddington ratio L_I/L_Edd estimated from optical and X-ray data. We find that very few Type 1 AGN accrete below L_I/L_Edd ~ 0.01, despite simulations of synthetic spectra which show that the survey is sensitive to such Type 1 AGN. At lower accretion rates the BLR may become obscured, diluted or nonexistent. We find evidence that Type 1 AGN at higher accretion rates have higher optical luminosities, as more of their emission comes from the cool (optical) accretion disk with respect to shorter wavelengths. We measure a larger range in accretion rate than previous works, suggesting that COSMOS is more efficient at finding…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
