Turning Back the Clock: Inferring the History of the Eight O'clock Arc
Steven L. Finkelstein (Texas A&M University), Casey Papovich (Texas, A&M University), Gregory Rudnick (University of Kansas), Eiichi Egami, (University of Arizona), Emeric Le Floc'h (University of Hawaii), Marcia J., Rieke (University of Arizona)

TL;DR
This study uses gravitational lensing to analyze the detailed properties of a high-redshift galaxy, revealing its star formation, metallicity, and gas content, providing insights into galaxy evolution at z~2.7.
Contribution
First detailed spectroscopic analysis of the gravitationally lensed 8 o'clock arc, measuring its redshift, outflows, metallicity, and star formation rate at high precision.
Findings
Star formation rate of ~270 solar masses per year.
Gas-phase metallicity of about 0.8 Z_sun.
Stellar mass approximately 4 x 10^11 M_sun.
Abstract
We present the results from an optical and near-infrared spectroscopic study of the ultraviolet-luminous z = 2.73 galaxy, the 8 o'clock arc. Due to gravitational lensing, this galaxy is magnified by a factor of > 10, allowing in-depth measurements which are usually unfeasible at such redshifts. In the optical spectra, we measured the systemic redshift of the galaxy, z = 2.7322 +/- 0.0012, using stellar photospheric lines. This differs from the redshift of absorption lines in the interstellar medium, z = 2.7302 +/- 0.0006, implying gas outflows on the order of 160 km/s. With H and K-band near-infrared spectra, we have measured nebular emission lines of Halpha, Hbeta, Hgamma, [N II] and [O III], which have a redshift z = 2.7333 +/- 0.0001, consistent with the derived systemic redshift. From the Balmer decrement, we measured the dust extinction to be A_5500 = 1.17 +/- 0.36 mag. Correcting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
