Comment on "Direct evidence for hidden one-dimensional Fermi surface of hexagonal K0.25WO3"
Roberta Poloni, Enric Canadell, Jean Paul Pouget

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous study by using first principles DFT calculations to challenge the claim of one-dimensional Fermi surface bands in K0.25WO3, questioning the origin of its resistivity anomaly.
Contribution
It provides a first-principles computational analysis that refutes the existence of the proposed one-dimensional bands in K0.25WO3.
Findings
No evidence of one-dimensional bands from DFT calculations
Challenges the charge density wave explanation for resistivity anomaly
Questions previous interpretations of photoemission data
Abstract
We comment a recent work titled "Direct evidence for hidden one-dimensional Fermi surface of hexagonal K0.25WO3". In this paper the authors report photoemission and theoretical results on the K0.25WO3 system which led them to propose that a Charge Density Wave (CDW), associated with hidden one-dimensional bands, was responsible for the well known resistivity anomaly in such system. In the present comment we report the results of a first principles density functional theory (DFT) study showing that there are no one-dimensional bands as suggested by these authors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
