Classification of BeppoSAX's Gamma-Ray Bursts
I. Horvath

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the duration distribution of 1003 GRBs from the BeppoSAX catalog, identifying an intermediate group and confirming the underrepresentation of short bursts due to detection system differences.
Contribution
It applies the Maximum Likelihood method to identify GRB groups in BeppoSAX data, notably confirming the intermediate group and discussing detection biases.
Findings
Identification of an intermediate GRB group in BeppoSAX data
Short bursts are underrepresented due to detection system differences
Multiple satellites observe the intermediate GRB type
Abstract
The BeppoSAX Catalog has been very recently published. In this paper we analyze - using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method - the duration distribution of the 1003 GRBs listed in the catalog with duration. The ML method can identify the long and the intermediate duration groups. The short population of the bursts is identified only at a 96% significance level. MC simulation has been also applied and gives a similar significance level; 95%. However, the existence of the short bursts is not a scientific question after the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory's observation. Our minor result is this well-known fact that in the BeppoSAX data the short bursts are underrepresented, mainly caused by the different triggering system. Our major result is the identification of the intermediate group in the BeppoSAX data. Therefore, four different satellites (CGRO, Swift, RHESSI and BeppoSAX) observed the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
