Simultaneous support recovery in high dimensions: Benefits and perils of block $\ell_1/\ell_\infty$-regularization
S. Negahban, M. J. Wainwright

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the high-dimensional behavior of $\, ext{l}_1/ ext{l}_ ext{infinity}$-regularized regression for joint estimation, revealing phase transitions and conditions where it outperforms or underperforms simpler methods depending on support overlap.
Contribution
It provides theoretical bounds, phase transition analysis, and insights into when block $ ext{l}_1/ ext{l}_ ext{infinity}$ regularization improves or worsens statistical efficiency.
Findings
Phase transition characterized by sample size and support overlap.
Improved efficiency when overlap exceeds 2/3.
Potential performance degradation for moderate to small overlap.
Abstract
Consider the use of -regularized regression for joint estimation of a matrix of regression coefficients. We analyze the high-dimensional scaling of -regularized quadratic programming, considering both consistency in -norm, and variable selection. We begin by establishing bounds on the -error as well sufficient conditions for exact variable selection for fixed and random designs. Our second set of results applies to linear regression problems with standard Gaussian designs whose supports overlap in a fraction of their entries: for this problem class, we prove that the -regularized method undergoes a phase transition--that is, a sharp change from failure to success--characterized by the rescaled sample size $\theta_{1,\infty}(n, p, s,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Image and Signal Denoising Methods
