On possible interpretations of the high energy electron-positron spectrum measured by the Fermi Large Area Telescope
D. Grasso, S. Profumo, A.W. Strong, L. Baldini, R. Bellazzini, E.D., Bloom, J. Bregeon, G. Di Bernardo, D. Gaggero, N. Giglietto, T. Kamae, L., Latronico, F. Longo, M.N. Mazziotta, A.A. Moiseev, A. Morselli, J.F. Ormes,, M. Pesce-Rollins, M. Pohl, M. Razzano, C. Sgro, G. Spandre

TL;DR
The paper analyzes Fermi-LAT's high-energy electron-positron spectrum measurements, exploring interpretations involving Galactic sources, pulsars, and dark matter, and discusses how combined experimental data challenge single-component models.
Contribution
It evaluates the consistency of different models explaining the CRE spectrum and proposes combined scenarios involving pulsars and dark matter as more plausible explanations.
Findings
Single component models are inconsistent with combined data.
Multiple source scenarios can fit the combined experimental results.
Anisotropy measurements could help distinguish between pulsar and dark matter origins.
Abstract
The Fermi-LAT experiment recently reported high precision measurements of the spectrum of cosmic-ray electrons-plus-positrons (CRE) between 20 GeV and 1 TeV. The spectrum shows no prominent spectral features, and is significantly harder than that inferred from several previous experiments. Here we discuss several interpretations of the Fermi results based either on a single large scale Galactic CRE component or by invoking additional electron-positron primary sources, e.g. nearby pulsars or particle Dark Matter annihilation. We show that while the reported Fermi-LAT data alone can be interpreted in terms of a single component scenario, when combined with other complementary experimental results, specifically the CRE spectrum measured by H.E.S.S. and especially the positron fraction reported by PAMELA between 1 and 100 GeV, that class of models fails to provide a consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
