Estimators for the exponent and upper limit, and goodness-of-fit tests for (truncated) power-law distributions
Thomas Maschberger (Cambridge, Bonn), Pavel Kroupa (Bonn)

TL;DR
This paper reviews and introduces bias-free estimators for power-law parameters, discusses graphical and statistical goodness-of-fit tests, and applies these methods to astronomical star data.
Contribution
It provides new bias-free estimators for the exponent and upper limit of power-law distributions, along with software tools and goodness-of-fit tests.
Findings
Bias-free estimators improve parameter accuracy
Graphical methods aid in data interpretation
Goodness-of-fit tests validate power-law models
Abstract
Many objects studied in astronomy follow a power law distribution function, for example the masses of stars or star clusters. A still used method by which such data is analysed is to generate a histogram and fit a straight line to it. The parameters obtained in this way can be severely biased, and the properties of the underlying distribution function, such as its shape or a possible upper limit, are difficult to extract. In this work we review techniques available in the literature and present newly developed (effectively) bias-free estimators for the exponent and the upper limit. The software packages are made available as downloads. Furthermore we discuss various graphical representations of the data and powerful goodness-of-fit tests to assess the validity of a power law for describing the distribution of data. As an example, we apply the presented methods to the data set of massive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
