Quantum deformations of the restriction of $GL_{mn}(\C)$-modules to $GL_m(\C) \times GL_n(\C)$
B. Adsul, M. Sohoni, K. V. Subrahmanyam

TL;DR
This paper constructs a q-deformation of modules obtained by restricting $GL_{mn}( ext{C})$-modules to $GL_m( ext{C}) imes GL_n( ext{C})$, providing explicit modules and bases that generalize classical representations.
Contribution
It introduces a new construction of q-deformed modules for the restriction of $GL_{mn}( ext{C})$-modules to $GL_m( ext{C}) imes GL_n( ext{C})$, including bi-crystal bases and equivariant maps.
Findings
Constructed $U_q(gl_m) imes U_q(gl_n)$-modules $igwedge^k$ as q-deformations.
Developed bi-crystal bases consisting of signed subsets.
Established equivariant maps for module construction.
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the restriction of finite dimensional -modules to the subgroup . In particular, for a Weyl module of we construct a representation of such that at , the restriction of to matches its action on at . Thus is a -deformation of the module . This is achieved by first constructing a -module , a -deformation of the simple -module . We also construct the bi-crystal basis for and show that it consists of signed subsets. Next, we develop -equivariant maps $\psi_{a,b} :\wedge^{a+1} \otimes \wedge^{b-1} \to \wedge^a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Advanced Topics in Algebra
