Structures of Local Galaxies Compared to High Redshift Star-forming Galaxies
Sara M. Petty, Duilia F. de Mello, John S. Gallagher III, Jonathan P., Gardner, Jennifer M. Lotz, C. Matt Mountain, Linda J. Smith

TL;DR
This study compares the UV morphologies of local starburst and interacting galaxies with high-redshift galaxies, using nonparametric methods to classify galaxy structures and infer evolutionary links.
Contribution
It introduces a combined use of M_20 and Sersic index for efficient morphological classification of galaxies across different redshifts.
Findings
20-30% of high-redshift galaxies have bulge-like structures.
Artificial redshifting shows similar morphological features at different epochs.
Approximately 20-30% of Lyman-break galaxies resemble local starburst mergers.
Abstract
The rest-frame far-ultraviolet (FUV) morphologies of 8 nearby interacting and starburst galaxies (Arp 269, M 82, Mrk 8, NGC 520, NGC 1068, NGC 3079, NGC 3310, NGC 7673) are compared with 54 galaxies at z ~ 1.5 and 46 galaxies at z ~ 4 observed in the GOODS-ACS field. The nearby sample is artificially redshifted to z ~ 1.5 and 4. We compare the simulated galaxy morphologies to real z ~ 1.5 and 4 UV-bright galaxy morphologies. We calculate the Gini coefficient (G), the second-order moment of the brightest 20% of the galaxy's flux (M_20), and the Sersic index (n). We explore the use of nonparametric methods with 2D profile fitting and find the combination of M_20 with n an efficient method to classify galaxies as having merger, exponential disk, or bulge-like morphologies. When classified according to G and M_20, 20/30% of real/simulated galaxies at z ~ 1.5 and 37/12% at z ~ 4 have…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
