Adaptive sampling for linear state estimation

TL;DR

This paper investigates optimal causal sampling policies for linear state estimation under limited communication rates, demonstrating that Delta sampling is suboptimal and proposing envelopes for optimal sampling in a Brownian motion model.

Contribution

It formulates the sampling policy design as an optimal stopping problem and derives the structure of optimal sampling envelopes, showing Delta sampling's inefficiency under rate constraints.

Findings

Optimal stopping times are when estimation error exceeds certain envelopes.

Delta sampling performs poorly compared to optimal policies.

Optimal sampling envelopes are analytically characterized for Brownian motion.

Abstract

When a sensor has continuous measurements but sends limited messages over a data network to a supervisor which estimates the state, the available packet rate fixes the achievable quality of state estimation. When such rate limits turn stringent, the sensor's messaging policy should be designed anew. What are the good causal messaging policies ? What should message packets contain ? What is the lowest possible distortion in a causal estimate at the supervisor ? Is Delta sampling better than periodic sampling ? We answer these questions under an idealized model of the network and the assumption of perfect measurements at the sensor. For a scalar, linear diffusion process, we study the problem of choosing the causal sampling times that will give the lowest aggregate squared error distortion. We stick to finite-horizons and impose a hard upper bound on the number of allowed samples. We cast the design as a problem of choosing an optimal sequence of stopping times. We reduce this to a nested sequence of problems each asking for a single optimal stopping time. Under an unproven but natural assumption about the least-square estimate at the supervisor, each of these single stopping problems are of standard form. The optimal stopping times are random times when the estimation error exceeds designed envelopes. For the case where the state is a Brownian motion, we give analytically: the shape of the optimal sampling envelopes, the shape of the envelopes under optimal Delta sampling, and their performances. Surprisingly, we find that Delta sampling performs badly. Hence, when the rate constraint is a hard limit on the number of samples over a finite horizon, we should should not use Delta sampling.