The H alpha Galaxy Survey. VIII. Close companions and interactions, and the definition of starbursts

TL;DR

This study examines the impact of close companions on star formation in local disk galaxies, finding modest increases in star formation rates without evidence of starburst activity, and critically discusses the definition of starbursts.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of how close companions influence star formation and questions the objectivity of the starburst classification.

Findings

Close companions increase star formation rate by just under two times.

Most interacting or merging galaxies in the local Universe show unremarkable star formation.

No single definition of starburst can objectively distinguish starburst galaxies.

Abstract

(Shortened) We consider the massive star formation properties, radial profiles, and atomic gas masses of those galaxies in our H alpha Galaxy Survey, a representative sample of the local Universe of 327 disk galaxies, that have close companion galaxies, in comparison with a matched control sample of galaxies without companions. We find that the presence of a close companion raises the star formation rate by a factor of just under two, while increasing hardly at all the equivalent width of the H alpha emission. This means that although statistically galaxies with close companions form stars at a higher rate, they do this over extended periods of time, and not as bursts. We find no significant increase in the central concentration of the star formation as a result of the presence of a close companion. The fraction of truly interacting or merging galaxies is very small in the local Universe, at around 2%, and possibly 4% of bright galaxies. Most of these interacting galaxies currently have unremarkable star formation properties. We also study the properties of the Survey galaxies with the most extreme values for star formation indicators such as rate, equivalent width, star formation rate per area, and gas depletion timescale. We find that each of these indicators favors a different subset of galaxies, and use this information to discuss critically the possible definitions of the term starburst to describe galaxies with enhanced star formation activity. We conclude that no one starburst definition can be devised which is objective and generally discriminant. Unless one restricts the use of the term "starburst" to a very small number of galaxies, the term will continue to be used for a heterogeneous and wide-ranging collection of objects with no physical basis for their classification as starburst.