On the relationship between rank-$(n-1)$ convexity and ${\mathcal S}$-quasiconvexity
Mariapia Palombaro

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between rank-$(n-1)$ convexity and ${ m extbf{S}}$-quasiconvexity, showing they are not equivalent in general but are in the space of $n imes n$ diagonal matrices, using counterexamples and generalizations.
Contribution
It demonstrates that rank-$(n-1)$ convexity does not imply ${ m extbf{S}}$-quasiconvexity in ${ m M}^{m imes n}$ for $m>n$, and establishes their equivalence in $n imes n$ diagonal matrices.
Findings
Rank-$(n-1)$ convexity does not imply ${ m extbf{S}}$-quasiconvexity in ${ m M}^{m imes n}$ for $m>n$.
In $n imes n$ diagonal matrices, rank-$(n-1)$ convexity and ${ m extbf{S}}$-quasiconvexity are equivalent.
The results adapt Sverak's counterexample and Mueller's work to different settings.
Abstract
We prove that rank- convexity does not imply -quasiconvexity (i.e., quasiconvexity with respect to divergence free fields) in for , by adapting the well-known Sverak's counterexample [5] to the solenoidal setting. On the other hand, we also remark that rank- convexity and -quasiconvexity turn out to be equivalent in the space of diagonal matrices. This follows by a generalization of Mueller's work [4].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic and geometric function theory · Optimization and Variational Analysis · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
