Studies of Millimeter-Wave Atmospheric Noise Above Mauna Kea
J. Sayers, S. R. Golwala, P. A. R. Ade, J. E. Aguirre, J. J. Bock, S., F. Edgington, J. Glenn, A. Goldin, D. Haig, A. E. Lange, G. T. Laurent, P. D., Mauskopf, H. T. Nguyen, P. Rossinot, and J. Schlaerth

TL;DR
This study measures atmospheric noise above Mauna Kea at millimeter wavelengths, compares it with the South Pole, and develops algorithms to mitigate its effects, highlighting the challenges in reaching photon-background-limited performance.
Contribution
It provides detailed atmospheric noise measurements at Mauna Kea, compares them with South Pole data, and introduces noise removal algorithms for submillimeter observations.
Findings
Atmospheric noise follows a Kolmogorov-Taylor turbulence model.
Noise amplitude is 80 times larger than at the South Pole.
Current algorithms cannot achieve photon-background-limited performance below 0.5 Hz.
Abstract
We report measurements of the fluctuations in atmospheric emission (atmospheric noise) above Mauna Kea recorded with Bolocam at 143 and 268 GHz from the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO). The 143 GHz data were collected during a 40 night observing run in late 2003, and the 268 GHz observations were made in early 2004 and early 2005 over a total of 60 nights. Below 0.5 Hz, the data time-streams are dominated by atmospheric noise in all observing conditions. The atmospheric noise data are consistent with a Kolmogorov-Taylor (K-T) turbulence model for a thin wind-driven screen, and the median amplitude of the fluctuations is 280 mK^2 rad^(-5/3) at 143 GHz and 4000 mK^2 rad^(-5/3) at 268 GHz. Comparing our results with previous ACBAR data, we find that the normalization of the power spectrum of the atmospheric noise fluctuations is a factor of 80 larger above Mauna Kea than above the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
