
TL;DR
This paper explores the computational complexity of representing various groups on graphs and trees, revealing equivalences to graph isomorphism problems and highlighting the difficulty of certain group homomorphism checks.
Contribution
It establishes the complexity equivalences between group representability on graphs and graph isomorphism, and characterizes the problem for groups on trees.
Findings
Abelian and solvable group representability are equivalent to graph isomorphism.
Representability on trees relates to homomorphism existence checks.
No known polynomial time algorithms for general group representability on trees.
Abstract
In this paper we formulate and study the problem of representing groups on graphs. We show that with respect to polynomial time turing reducibility, both abelian and solvable group representability are all equivalent to graph isomorphism, even when the group is presented as a permutation group via generators. On the other hand, the representability problem for general groups on trees is equivalent to checking, given a group and , whether a nontrivial homomorphism from to exists. There does not seem to be a polynomial time algorithm for this problem, in spite of the fact that tree isomorphism has polynomial time algorithm.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
