A short proof that adding some permutation rules to beta preserves SN
Ren\'e David (LAMA)

TL;DR
This paper proves that adding certain permutation rules to the beta reduction in lambda calculus does not affect the strong normalization property of terms that are already strongly normalizing under beta.
Contribution
It provides a short proof demonstrating that specific permutation rules preserve strong normalization in lambda calculus.
Findings
Permutation rules do not break strong normalization.
The proof is concise and applicable to certain lambda calculus extensions.
Strong normalization is maintained with added permutation rules.
Abstract
I show that, if a term is for , it remains when some permutation rules are added.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCoding theory and cryptography · Algorithms and Data Compression
