Measurement of the scintillation time spectra and pulse-shape discrimination of low-energy beta and nuclear recoils in liquid argon with DEAP-1
P.-A. Amaudruz, M. Batygov, B. Beltran, J. Bonatt, K. Boudjemline,, M.G. Boulay, B. Broerman, J.F. Bueno, A. Butcher, B. Cai, T. Caldwell, M., Chen, R. Chouinard, B.T. Cleveland, D. Cranshaw, K. Dering, F. Duncan, N., Fatemighomi, R. Ford, R. Gagnon, P. Giampa, F. Giuliani

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates highly effective pulse-shape discrimination in liquid argon detectors for low-energy beta and nuclear recoils, achieving extremely low background contamination levels crucial for dark matter searches.
Contribution
It introduces a mathematical framework for pulse-shape discrimination and provides experimental results showing unprecedented background rejection capabilities in liquid argon detectors.
Findings
Misidentification fraction of beta events below 1.4e-7 at 43-86 keVee
Upper limit on electronic recoil contamination below 2.7e-8 at 44-89 keVee
Projected misidentification fraction of 1e-10 at 15 keV threshold
Abstract
The DEAP-1 low-background liquid argon detector was used to measure scintillation pulse shapes of electron and nuclear recoil events and to demonstrate the feasibility of pulse-shape discrimination (PSD) down to an electron-equivalent energy of 20 keV. In the surface dataset using a triple-coincidence tag we found the fraction of beta events that are misidentified as nuclear recoils to be (90% C.L.) for energies between 43-86 keVee and for a nuclear recoil acceptance of at least 90%, with 4% systematic uncertainty on the absolute energy scale. The discrimination measurement on surface was limited by nuclear recoils induced by cosmic-ray generated neutrons. This was improved by moving the detector to the SNOLAB underground laboratory, where the reduced background rate allowed the same measurement with only a double-coincidence tag. The combined data set contains…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
