The largest and the smallest fixed points of permutations
Emeric Deutsch, Sergi Elizalde

TL;DR
This paper offers new combinatorial interpretations of derangement numbers by relating them to fixed points of permutations, along with proofs and a recurrence relation.
Contribution
It introduces novel interpretations of derangement numbers based on fixed points and provides new proofs and a recurrence relation.
Findings
Derangement numbers equal the sum of largest fixed points of non-derangements.
Sum of smallest fixed points corresponds to permutations with at least two fixed points.
Provides analytic and bijective proofs for these interpretations.
Abstract
We give a new interpretation of the derangement numbers d_n as the sum of the values of the largest fixed points of all non-derangements of length n-1. We also show that the analogous sum for the smallest fixed points equals the number of permutations of length n with at least two fixed points. We provide analytic and bijective proofs of both results, as well as a new recurrence for the derangement numbers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Advanced Mathematical Identities · Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
