Bayesian analysis of white noise levels in the 5-year WMAP data
N. E. Groeneboom, H. K. Eriksen, K. Gorski, G. Huey, J. Jewell, B., Wandelt

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian method to accurately estimate white noise levels in CMB sky maps, applied to WMAP data, revealing slight biases in the initially provided noise estimates and confirming the method's practical utility.
Contribution
A new Bayesian framework for estimating white noise levels in CMB maps, integrated into a Gibbs sampler, validated on simulated data and applied to WMAP 5-year data.
Findings
Estimated noise bias of 0.5-1.0% in WMAP maps
Validated Bayesian method on simulated data
Confirmed correctness of WMAP's internal noise values
Abstract
We develop a new Bayesian method for estimating white noise levels in CMB sky maps, and apply this algorithm to the 5-year WMAP data. We assume that the amplitude of the noise RMS is scaled by a constant value, alpha, relative to a pre-specified noise level. We then derive the corresponding conditional density, P(alpha | s, Cl, d), which is subsequently integrated into a general CMB Gibbs sampler. We first verify our code by analyzing simulated data sets, and then apply the framework to the WMAP data. For the foreground-reduced 5-year WMAP sky maps and the nominal noise levels initially provided in the 5-year data release, we find that the posterior means typically range between alpha=1.005 +- 0.001 and alpha=1.010 +- 0.001 depending on differencing assembly, indicating that the noise level of these maps are biased low by 0.5-1.0%. The same problem is not observed for the uncorrected…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
