Random walk versus random line
Joel De Coninck, Francois Dunlop, Thierry Huillet

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the behavior of certain random walks with drift and their equivalence to Solid-On-Solid models, exploring phase transitions related to wetting phenomena and phase diagrams.
Contribution
It revisits the law equivalence between random walk bridges and Solid-On-Solid models, detailing phase diagrams and wetting transitions based on drift parameters.
Findings
Complete wetting occurs for delta <= 1.
Critical partial wetting occurs for delta > 1.
Phase diagrams are characterized by recurrence and wetting regimes.
Abstract
We consider random walks X_n in Z+, obeying a detailed balance condition, with a weak drift towards the origin when X_n tends to infinity. We reconsider the equivalence in law between a random walk bridge and a 1+1 dimensional Solid-On-Solid bridge with a corresponding Hamiltonian. Phase diagrams are discussed in terms of recurrence versus wetting. A drift -delta/X_n of the random walk yields a Solid-On-Solid potential with an attractive well at the origin and a repulsive tail delta(delta+2)/(8X_n^2) at infinity, showing complete wetting for delta<=1 and critical partial wetting for delta>1.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
