A Comparison of Galaxy Merger History Observations and Predictions from Semi-Analytic Models

TL;DR

This study compares galaxy merger predictions from the Millennium simulation with observations up to redshift 3, revealing good agreement at high masses and low redshifts but significant underprediction at lower masses and higher redshifts.

Contribution

It introduces a new method for comparing merger histories directly with observations, highlighting discrepancies and exploring effects of feedback variations in simulations.

Findings

Predicted merger rates match observations for massive galaxies at z<2.

Simulations underpredict merger fractions at z>2 by a factor of 4-10.

Merger fraction and rate evolution peaks at 1<z<2 across most mass bins.

Abstract

We present a detailed analysis of predicted galaxy-galaxy merger fractions and rates in the Millennium simulation and compare these with the most up to date observations of the same quantities up to z~3. We carry out our analysis by considering the predicted merger history in the Millennium simulation within a given time interval, as a function of stellar mass. This method, as opposed to pair fraction counts, considers mergers that have already taken place, and allows a more direct comparison with the observed rates and fractions measured with the concentration-asymmetry-clumpiness (CAS) method. We examine the evolution of the predicted merger fraction and rate in the Millennium simulation for galaxies with stellar masses M_* ~ 10^9 - 10^12 M_sun. We find that the predicted merger rates and fractions match the observations well for galaxies with M_* > 10^11 M_sun at z<2, while significant discrepancies occur at lower stellar masses, and at z>2 for M_* > 10^11 M_sun systems. At z>2 the simulations underpredict the observed merger fractions by a factor of 4-10. The shape of the predicted merger fraction and rate evolutions are similar to the observations up to z~2, and peak at 1<z<2 in almost all mass bins. The exception is the merger rate of galaxies with M_* > 10^11 M_sun. We discuss possible reasons for these discrepancies, and compare different realisations of the Millennium simulation to understand the effect of varying the physical implementation of feedback. We conclude that the comparison is potentially affected by a number of issues, including uncertainties in interpreting the observations and simulations in terms of the assumed merger mass ratios and merger time-scales. (abridged)