The evolution of the mass-metallicity relation in galaxies of different morphological types
F. Calura (1), A. Pipino (2), C. Chiappini (3,4), F. Matteucci (1,4),, R. Maiolino (5) - ((1) Univ. Trieste, Italy; (2) University of Southern, California, USA; (3) Obs. de Geneve, Switzerland; (4) INAF-Oss. di Trieste,, Italy; (5) INAF-Oss. di Roma, Italy)

TL;DR
This study uses chemical evolution models to explore how the mass-metallicity relation varies with galaxy morphology and redshift, suggesting different galaxy types dominate at different cosmic times.
Contribution
It introduces a method to incorporate galaxy formation epochs and refine mass grids, providing insights into the evolution of the mass-metallicity relation across galaxy types.
Findings
The mass-metallicity relation is mainly driven by star formation efficiency, not outflows.
High-redshift galaxies (z=3.5) are likely proto-ellipticals.
At z=2.2, a mix of proto-spirals and proto-ellipticals is observed.
Abstract
By means of chemical evolution models for ellipticals, spirals and irregular galaxies, we aim at investigating the physical meaning and the redshift evolution of the mass-metallicity relation as well as how this relation is connected with galaxy morphology. {abridged} We assume that galaxy morphologies do not change with cosmic time. We present a method to account for a spread in the epochs of galaxy formation and to refine the galactic mass grid. (abridged) We compare our predictions to observational results obtained for galaxies between redshifts 0.07 and 3.5. We reproduce the mass-metallicity (MZ) relation mainly by means of an increasing efficiency of star formation with mass in galaxies of all morphological types, without any need to invokegalactic outflows favoring the loss of metals in the less massive galaxies. Our predictions can help constraining the slope and the zero point…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
