Tangential LS-category of K(pi,1)-foliations
Wilhelm Singhof, Elmar Vogt

TL;DR
This paper investigates the tangential LS-category of K(pi,1)-foliations, establishing bounds, examining homological invariants, and classifying low-category cases, with implications for foliations on open and closed manifolds.
Contribution
It provides new bounds for the tangential LS-category of K(pi,1)-foliations, explores limitations of foliated cohomology as an invariant, and classifies low-category foliations on closed manifolds.
Findings
For C^2 K(pi,1)-foliations on closed manifolds, cat F equals the dimension of the foliation.
Foliated cohomology groups can be infinite dimensional, failing as a lower bound for cat F.
C^1-foliations with cat F ≤ 1 are locally trivial homotopy sphere bundles.
Abstract
A K(pi,1)-foliation is one for which the universal covers of all leaves are contractible (thus all leaves are K(pi,1)'s for some pi). In the first part of the paper we show that the tangential Lusternik--Schnirelmann category cat F of a K(pi,1)-foliation F on a manifold M is bounded from below by t-codim F for any t with H_t(M;A) nonzero for some coefficient group A. Since for any C^2-foliation F one has cat F <= dim F by our Theorem 5.2 of [Topology 42 (2003) 603-627], this implies that cat F = dim F for K(pi,1)-foliations of class C^2 on closed manifolds. For K(pi,1)-foliations on open manifolds the above estimate is far from optimal, so one might hope for some other homological lower bound for cat F. In the second part we see that foliated cohomology will not work. For we show that the p-th foliated cohomology group of a p-dimensional foliation of positive codimension is an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
