Estimating cosmological parameters from future gravitational lens surveys
Benjamin M. Dobke, Lindsay J. King, Christopher D. Fassnacht, Matthew, W. Auger

TL;DR
This paper explores how future gravitational lens surveys can significantly improve constraints on cosmological parameters like Omega_m, Omega_Lambda, and H_0 by analyzing large samples of time delay lenses, assuming certain galaxy and cosmology models.
Contribution
It demonstrates that large samples of time delay lenses can yield competitive cosmological constraints, emphasizing the importance of accurate prior knowledge of lens populations.
Findings
Approximately 400 time delay lenses can constrain Omega_m and Omega_Lambda with precision comparable to other methods.
Sample sizes of around 100 lenses can measure H_0 with a few percent error.
Inaccurate prior knowledge broadens the constraints, underscoring the need for reliable sample characterization.
Abstract
Upcoming ground and space based observatories such as the DES, the LSST, the JDEM concepts and the SKA, promise to dramatically increase the size of strong gravitational lens samples. A significant fraction of the systems are expected to be time delay lenses. Many of the existing lensing degeneracies become less of an issue with large samples since the distributions of a number of parameters are predictable, and can be incorporated into an analysis, thus helping to lessen the degeneracy. Assuming a mean galaxy density profile that does not evolve with redshift, a Lambda-CDM cosmology, and Gaussian distributions for bulk parameters describing the lens and source populations, we generate synthetic lens catalogues and examine the relationship between constraints on the Omega_m - Omega_Lambda plane and H_0 with increasing lens sample size. We find that, with sample sizes of ~400 time delay…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
