The nature of the young and low-mass open clusters Pismis5, vdB80, NGC1931 and BDSB96

TL;DR

This study characterizes four young, low-mass open clusters using near-IR photometry, revealing their ages, masses, structures, and evolutionary states, suggesting some may dissolve or evolve into OB associations.

Contribution

First detailed near-IR analysis of these four young low-mass open clusters, providing insights into their structure, age, mass, and dynamical state, and implications for their evolution.

Findings

Clusters are young (5-10 Myr) with low masses (~60-180 solar masses).

Stellar density profiles follow King-like profiles except for irregular inner regions.

Some clusters may dissolve or evolve into OB associations within tens of millions of years.

Abstract

We investigate the nature of 4 young and low-mass open clusters (OCs) located in the $2^{nd}$ and $3^{rd}$ quadrants with near-IR 2MASS photometry (errors $<0.1$ mag). After field decontamination, the colour-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) display similar morphologies: a poorly-populated main sequence (MS) and a dominant fraction of pre-MS (PMS) stars somewhat affected by differential reddening. Pismis 5, vdB 80 and BDSB 96 have MS ages within $5\pm4$ Myr, while the MS of NGC 1931 is $10\pm3$ Myr old. However, non-instantaneous star formation is implied by the wider ($\sim20$ Myr) PMS age spread. The cluster masses derived from MS + PMS stars are low, within $\sim60-180 \ms$, with mass functions (MFs) significantly flatter than Salpeter's initial mass function (IMF). Distances from the Sun are within $1.0-2.4$ kpc, and the visual absorptions are in the range $\aV=1.0-2.0$. From the stellar radial density profiles (RDPs), we find that they are small ($\rc\la0.48$ pc, $\rl\la5.8$ pc), especially Pismis 5 with $\rc\approx0.2$ pc and $\rl\approx1.8$ pc. Except for the irregular and cuspy inner regions of NGC 1931 and Pismis 5, the stellar RDPs follow a King-like profile. At $\sim10$ Myr, central cusps - which in old clusters appear to be related to advanced dynamical evolution - are probably associated with a star-formation and/or molecular cloud fragmentation effect. Despite the flat MFs, vdB 80 and BDSB 96 appear to be typical young, low-mass OCs. NGC 1931 and especially Pismis 5, with irregular RDPs, low cluster mass and flat MFs, do not appear to be in dynamical equilibrium. Both may be evolving into OB associations and/or doomed to dissolution in a few $10^7$ yr.