Learning convex bodies is hard
Navin Goyal, Luis Rademacher

TL;DR
This paper proves that learning convex bodies in high-dimensional space from random samples is computationally hard, requiring exponentially many samples relative to the dimension and accuracy, by constructing a simple hard family using error correcting codes.
Contribution
It establishes a fundamental lower bound on the sample complexity of learning convex bodies, introducing a simple construction based on error correcting codes.
Findings
Learning convex bodies requires exponential samples in dimension and accuracy.
A simple family of convex bodies is constructed to prove the lower bound.
The result highlights inherent computational difficulty in high-dimensional convex body learning.
Abstract
We show that learning a convex body in , given random samples from the body, requires samples. By learning a convex body we mean finding a set having at most relative symmetric difference with the input body. To prove the lower bound we construct a hard to learn family of convex bodies. Our construction of this family is very simple and based on error correcting codes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Machine Learning and Algorithms
