Radio and mid-infrared identification of BLAST source counterparts in the Chandra Deep Field South
Simon Dye, Peter A. R. Ade, James J. Bock, Edward L. Chapin, Mark J., Devlin, James S. Dunlop, Stephen A. Eales, Matthew Griffin, Joshua O., Gundersen, Mark Halpern, Peter C. Hargrave, David H. Hughes, Jeff Klein,, Benjamin Magnelli, Gaelen Marsden, Philip Mauskopf

TL;DR
This study identifies and characterizes BLAST sources in the Chandra Deep Field South using radio and mid-infrared data, revealing their redshift distribution, dust temperatures, and star formation rates, and providing a comprehensive multi-wavelength catalog.
Contribution
It presents the first extensive multi-wavelength identification and analysis of BLAST sources in the CDFS, including redshifts, SED fitting, and insights into dust temperature evolution.
Findings
BLAST sources are at lower redshifts than 850 um submm sources.
Dust temperatures are lower compared to high-redshift submm sources.
Selection effects influence observed dust temperature-redshift relations.
Abstract
We have identified radio and/or mid-infrared counterparts to 198 out of 350 sources detected at >=5 sigma over ~ 9 square degrees centered on the Chandra Deep Field South (CDFS) by the Balloon-borne Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (BLAST) at 250, 350 and 500 um. We have matched 114 of these counterparts to optical sources with previously derived photometric redshifts and fitted SEDs to the BLAST fluxes and fluxes at 70 and 160 um acquired with the Spitzer Space Telescope. In this way, we have constrained dust temperatures, total far-infrared/sub-millimeter luminosities and star formation rates for each source. Our findings show that on average, the BLAST sources lie at significantly lower redshifts and have significantly lower rest-frame dust temperatures compared to submm sources detected in surveys conducted at 850 um. We demonstrate that an apparent increase in dust…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
