Logarithmic corrections in (4+1)-dimensional directed percolation
Peter Grassberger

TL;DR
This paper provides precise estimates of critical points in (4+1)-dimensional directed percolation and analyzes logarithmic corrections, demonstrating the importance of next-to-leading terms for accurate modeling.
Contribution
The study offers the most accurate critical point estimates for 4+1D directed percolation and compares detailed logarithmic correction calculations with simulation data.
Findings
Leading logarithmic fits overestimate correction powers by 50%.
Including next-to-leading terms yields nearly perfect fits.
One observable combination appears free of logarithmic corrections.
Abstract
We simulate directed site percolation on two lattices with 4 spatial and 1 time-like dimensions (simple and body-centered hypercubic in space) with the standard single cluster spreading scheme. For efficiency, the code uses the same ingredients (hashing, histogram re-weighing, and improved estimators) as described in Phys. Rev. {\bf E 67}, 036101 (2003). Apart from providing the most precise estimates for on these lattices, we provide a detailed comparison with the logarithmic corrections calculated by Janssen and Stenull [Phys. Rev. {\bf E 69}, 016125 (2004)]. Fits with the leading logarithmic terms alone would give estimates of the powers of these logarithms which are too big by typically 50%. When the next-to-leading terms are included, each of the measured quantities (the average number of sites wetted at time , their average distance from the seed, and the probability of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
