Modelling the binary progenitor of supernova 1993J
Richard J. Stancliffe (1, 2), John J. Eldridge (1) ((1) Institute, of Astronomy, Cambridge, (2) Centre for Stellar, Planetary Astrophysics,, Monash University)

TL;DR
This paper presents a detailed binary stellar evolution model to identify potential progenitors of supernova 1993J, exploring how different initial conditions and mass transfer efficiencies can reproduce observed properties.
Contribution
The authors developed a comprehensive binary evolution code and applied it to model supernova 1993J's progenitor system, considering various physical effects and mass transfer efficiencies.
Findings
A 15+14 solar mass system with 100% mass transfer efficiency fits observations.
A 17+16 solar mass system with 50% efficiency also reproduces observed features.
Initial orbital periods around 2100-2360 days are consistent with the progenitor system.
Abstract
We have developed a detailed stellar evolution code capable of following the simultaneous evolution of both stars in a binary system, together with their orbital properties. To demonstrate the capabilities of the code we investigate potential progenitors for the Type IIb supernova 1993J, which is believed to have been an interacting binary system prior to its primary exploding. We use our detailed binary stellar evolution code to model this system to determine the possible range of primary and secondary masses that could have produced the observed characteristics of this system, with particular reference to the secondary. Using the luminosities and temperatures for both stars (as determined by Maund et al. 2004) and the remaining mass of the hydrogen envelope of the primary at the time of explosion, we find that if mass transfer is 100 per cent efficient the observations can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
