Quasipolynomial Normalisation in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold Formulae
Paola Bruscoli, Alessio Guglielmi, Tom Gundersen, Michel Parigot

TL;DR
This paper presents a direct quasipolynomial-time cut-elimination method for classical propositional logic in deep inference, utilizing atomic flows to simplify and faithfully represent the process.
Contribution
It introduces a new direct proof of quasipolynomial cut-elimination in deep inference using atomic flows, improving upon previous indirect methods.
Findings
Quasipolynomial cut-elimination is achievable directly in deep inference.
Atomic flows effectively represent the cut-elimination process.
The method simplifies the proof of Jeřábek's result.
Abstract
Je\v{r}\'abek showed that cuts in classical propositional logic proofs in deep inference can be eliminated in quasipolynomial time. The proof is indirect and it relies on a result of Atserias, Galesi and Pudl\'ak about monotone sequent calculus and a correspondence between that system and cut-free deep-inference proofs. In this paper we give a direct proof of Je\v{r}\'abek's result: we give a quasipolynomial-time cut-elimination procedure for classical propositional logic in deep inference. The main new ingredient is the use of a computational trace of deep-inference proofs called atomic flows, which are both very simple (they only trace structural rules and forget logical rules) and strong enough to faithfully represent the cut-elimination procedure.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
