Embeddings of local fields in simple algebras and simplicial structures on the Bruhat-Tits building
Dr. Daniel Skodlerack

TL;DR
This paper explores how embedding invariants of field extensions in simple algebras relate to the structure of Euclidean buildings, connecting algebraic invariants with geometric and combinatorial properties.
Contribution
It establishes a relationship between embedding invariants and the simplicial structure of Euclidean buildings associated with central simple algebras over local fields.
Findings
Relation between embedding invariants and simplicial structures
Behavior of the map j_E with respect to Euclidean buildings
Connection between algebraic embeddings and geometric structures
Abstract
This article answers a question that naturally arises from the articles by Grabitz and Broussous "Pure elements and intertwining classes of simple strata in local central simple algebras" and Broussous and Lemaire "Buildings of GL(m,D) and Centralizers". For an Azumaya-Algebra A over a non-Archimedean local field F, Grabitz and Broussous have introduced embedding invariants for field embeddings, that is for pairs (E,a), where E is a field extension of F in A, and is a hereditary order which is normalised by E^x. On the other hand if we take such a field extension E and define B to be the centralizer of E in A, then G:=A^x and G_E:=B^x are sets of rational points of reductive groups defined over F and E respectively. Broussous and Lemaire have defined a map j_E: I^{E^x}\to I_E, where is the the Euclidean building of , and I_E is the Euclidean building of G_E. The question…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topics in Algebra · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Finite Group Theory Research
