Local structure and site occupancy of Cd and Hg substitutions in CeTIn5 (T=Co, Rh, Ir)
C. H. Booth, E. D. Bauer, A. D. Bianchi, F. Ronning, J. D. Thompson,, J. L. Sarrao, Jung Young Cho, Julia Y. Chan, C. Capan, and Z. Fisk

TL;DR
This study investigates how Cd and Hg atoms substitute into CeTIn5 superconductors, revealing their site preferences and how these substitutions influence electronic and magnetic properties near the superconducting phase.
Contribution
It provides detailed EXAFS measurements of atom distributions and site preferences for Cd and Hg substitutions, linking local atomic structure to bulk electronic behavior.
Findings
Cd and Hg prefer the In(1) site more than Sn.
Site occupancy varies with T and substituent type.
Substitutions significantly affect superconducting properties.
Abstract
The CeTIn5 superconductors (T=Co, Rh, or Ir) have generated great interest due to their relatively Tc's, NFL behavior, and their proximity to AF order and quantum critical points. In contrast to small changes with the T-species, electron doping in CeT(In{1-x}Mx)5 with M=Sn and hole doping with Cd or Hg have a dramatic effect on the electronic properties at very low concentrations. The present work reports EXAFS measurements that address the substituent atom distribution as a function of T, M, and x, near the superconducting phase. Together with previous measurements for M=Sn, the proportion of the M atom residing on the In(1) site, f{In(1)}, increases in the order M=Cd, Sn, and Hg, ranging from about 40% to 70%, showing a strong preference for these substituents to occupy the In(1) site (random=20%). In addition, f{In(1)} ranges from 70% to 100% for M=Hg in the order T=Co, Rh, and Ir.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
