Testing Fundamental Physics with Distant Star Clusters: Analysis of Observational Data on Palomar 14

TL;DR

This study measures the velocity dispersion of Palomar 14 to test classical Newtonian gravity against MOND, finding results consistent with Newtonian predictions and suggesting no dark matter is needed in this distant globular cluster.

Contribution

The paper provides observational data on Palomar 14's velocity dispersion and mass function, testing gravitational theories and challenging MOND predictions for such remote clusters.

Findings

Velocity dispersion matches Newtonian predictions

Mass function is shallower than canonical

No dark matter required in Palomar 14

Abstract

We use the distant outer halo globular cluster Palomar 14 as a test case for classical vs. modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). Previous theoretical calculations have shown that the line-of-sight velocity dispersion predicted by these theories can differ by up to a factor of three for such sparse, remote clusters like Pal 14. We determine the line-of-sight velocity dispersion of Palomar 14 by measuring radial velocities of 17 red giant cluster members obtained using the Very Large Telescope (VLT) and Keck telescope. The systemic velocity of Palomar 14 is (72.28+-0.12)km/s. The derived velocity dispersion of (0.38+-0.12)km/s of the 16 definite member stars is in agreement with the theoretical prediction for the classical Newtonian case according to Baumgardt et al. (2005). In order to exclude the possibility that a peculiar mass function might have influenced our measurements, we derived the cluster's main sequence mass function down to 0.53Msolar using archival images obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope. We found a mass function slope of 1.27+-0.44, which is, compared to the canonical mass function, a significantly shallower slope. The derived lower limit on the cluster's mass is higher than the theoretically predicted mass in case of MOND. Our data are consistent with a central density of 0.1 Msolar pc^-3. We need no dark matter in Palomar 14. If the cluster is on a circular orbit, our spectroscopic and photometric results argue against MOND, unless this cluster experienced significant mass loss.