Limitations of the Standard Gravitational Perfect Fluid Paradigm
Philip D. Mannheim, James G. O'Brien, David Eric Cox

TL;DR
This paper challenges the validity of the perfect fluid paradigm in curved spacetimes, showing that intrinsic length scales can induce anisotropic stress terms in the energy-momentum tensor, which are often overlooked.
Contribution
It demonstrates that covariantizing flat spacetime perfect fluids neglects intrinsic scales, leading to additional anisotropic stress terms in curved space energy-momentum tensors.
Findings
Intrinsic length scales in curved space affect fluid structure.
Anisotropic stress tensor $\pi_{\mu u}$ arises in curved space steady states.
Effect of $\pi_{\mu u}$ terms is small in weak gravity stars.
Abstract
We show that the standard perfect fluid paradigm is not necessarily a valid description of a curved space steady state gravitational source. Simply by virtue of not being flat, curved space geometries have to possess intrinsic length scales, and such length scales can affect the fluid structure. For modes of wavelength of order or greater than such scales eikonalized geometrical optics cannot apply and rays are not geodesic. Covariantizing thus entails not only the replacing of flat space functions by covariant ones, but also the introduction of intrinsic scales that were absent in flat space. In principle it is thus unreliable to construct the curved space energy-momentum tensor as the covariant generalization of a geodesic-based flat spacetime energy-momentum tensor. By constructing the partition function as an incoherent average over a complete set of modes of a scalar field…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
