First stars XII. Abundances in extremely metal-poor turnoff stars,and comparison with the giants
P. Bonifacio (1,2,3), M. Spite (2), R. Cayrel (2), V. Hill (2,4), F., Spite (2), P. Francois (2), B. Plez (5,6), H.-G Ludwig (1,2), E. Caffau (2),, P. Molaro (3), E. Depagne (7), J. Andersen (8,9), B. Barbuy (10), T.C. Beers, (11), B. Nordstrom (8)

TL;DR
This study compares chemical abundances in extremely metal-poor turnoff stars with giants, revealing both consistencies and discrepancies that inform understanding of early Galactic chemical evolution.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of elemental abundances between EMP turnoff stars and giants using high-resolution spectra and discusses potential causes for observed differences.
Findings
Excellent consistency for Ca, Ni, Sr, and Ba with giant stars.
Discrepancies of ~0.2 dex for C, Sc, Ti, Cr, Mn, Co between dwarfs and giants.
NLTE computations improve abundance agreement for Na and Al.
Abstract
CONTEXT:The detailed chemical abundances of extremely metal-poor (EMP) stars are key guides to understanding the early chemical evolution of the Galaxy. Most existing data are, however, for giant stars which may have experienced internal mixing later. AIMS: We aim to compare the results for giants with new, accurate abundances for all observable elements in 18 EMP turnoff stars. METHODS:VLT/UVES spectra at R ~45,000 and S/N~ 130 per pixel (330-1000 nm) are analysed with OSMARCS model atmospheres and the TURBOSPECTRUM code to derive abundances for C, Mg, Si, Ca, Sc, Ti, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Zn, Sr, and Ba. RESULTS: For Ca, Ni, Sr, and Ba, we find excellent consistency with our earlier sample of EMP giants, at all metallicities. However, our abundances of C, Sc, Ti, Cr, Mn and Co are ~0.2 dex larger than in giants of similar metallicity. Mg and Si abundances are ~0.2 dex lower (the giant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
