A proof of completeness for continuous first-order logic
Ita\"i Ben Yaacov (ICJ), Arthur Paul Pedersen

TL;DR
This paper proves that continuous first-order logic has a completeness property where satisfiability aligns with consistency, and it establishes an approximate strong completeness theorem allowing finite proofs to approximate truth arbitrarily closely.
Contribution
It provides a proof of completeness for continuous first-order logic, including an approximate strong completeness theorem, which was previously not established.
Findings
Satisfiability in continuous first-order logic is equivalent to consistency.
Continuous first-order logic satisfies an approximate form of strong completeness.
Finite proofs can approximate the truth of formulas arbitrarily closely.
Abstract
The primary purpose of this article is to show that a certain natural set of axioms yields a completeness result for continuous first-order logic. In particular, we show that in continuous first-order logic a set of formulae is (completely) satisfiable if (and only if) it is consistent. From this result it follows that continuous first-order logic also satisfies an \emph{approximated} form of strong completeness, whereby (if and) only if for all . This approximated form of strong completeness asserts that if , then proofs from , being finite, can provide arbitrary better approximations of the truth of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
