A canonical transformation and the tunneling probability for the birth of an asymptotically DeSitter universe with dust
E. V. Corr\^ea Silva, G. A. Monerat, G. Oliveira-Neto, C. Neves, L. G., Ferreira Filho

TL;DR
This paper introduces a canonical transformation in quantum cosmology models with dust and a positive cosmological constant, simplifying the Wheeler-DeWitt equation and analyzing the universe's tunneling probability.
Contribution
The paper presents a new canonical transformation that removes operator ordering ambiguities, facilitating the numerical analysis of quantum cosmological models with dust.
Findings
Canonical transformation simplifies quantum treatment of cosmological models.
Numerical solutions show the evolution of the wave function in dust-filled universe.
Comparison with radiative fluid model highlights differences in tunneling probabilities.
Abstract
In the present work, we study the quantum cosmology description of closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker models in the presence of a positive cosmological constant and a generic perfect fluid. We work in the Schutz's variational formalism. If one uses the scale factor and its canonically conjugated momentum as the phase space variables that describe the geometrical sector of these models, one obtains Wheeler-DeWitt equations with operator ordering ambiguities. In order to avoid those ambiguities and simplify the quantum treatment of the models, we introduce new phase space variables. We explicitly demonstrate that the transformation leading from the old set of variables to the new one is canonical. In order to show that the above canonical transformations simplify the quantum treatment of those models, we consider a particular model where the perfect fluid is dust. We solve the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
