The Discrepancy of the Lex-Least De Bruijn Sequence
Joshua Cooper, Christine Heitsch

TL;DR
This paper determines the discrepancy of the lexicographically-least binary de Bruijn sequence, showing it grows proportionally to 2^n log n divided by n, which answers a question posed by R. L. Graham.
Contribution
It provides a precise asymptotic estimate for the discrepancy of the lex-least binary de Bruijn sequence, a problem previously unresolved.
Findings
Discrepancy is Θ(2^n log n / n)
Quantifies imbalance in initial segments of the sequence
Addresses a question by R. L. Graham
Abstract
We answer the following question of R. L. Graham: What is the discrepancy of the lexicographically-least binary de Bruijn sequence? Here, "discrepancy" refers to the maximum (absolute) difference between the number of ones and the number of zeros in any initial segment of the sequence. We show that the answer is .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRenaissance Literature and Culture · Medieval Literature and History · Linguistics and language evolution
