Clustering of Low-Redshift (z <= 2.2) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Nicholas P. Ross (1), Yue Shen (2), Michael A. Strauss (2), Daniel E., Vanden Berk (1), Andrew J. Connolly (3), Gordon T. Richards (4), Donald P., Schneider (1), David H. Weinberg (5), Patrick B. Hall (6), Neta A. Bahcall, (2)

TL;DR
This study measures the clustering of low-redshift quasars from SDSS, finding little evolution in their spatial distribution and suggesting they inhabit dark matter haloes of roughly constant mass across redshifts 0.3 to 2.2.
Contribution
It provides the largest quasar clustering dataset to date over a broad redshift range, with detailed analysis of clustering evolution and dark matter halo occupation.
Findings
Quasar correlation length remains roughly constant at s0 ~ 6-7 h^-1 Mpc for z<2.2.
Linear bias increases from ~1.4 at z=0.5 to ~3 at z=2.2.
Quasars inhabit dark matter haloes of about 2 x 10^12 h^-1 M_Sol across the studied redshift range.
Abstract
We present measurements of the quasar two-point correlation function, \xi_{Q}, over the redshift range z=0.3-2.2 based upon data from the SDSS. Using a homogeneous sample of 30,239 quasars with spectroscopic redshifts from the DR5 Quasar Catalogue, our study represents the largest sample used for this type of investigation to date. With this redshift range and an areal coverage of approx 4,000 deg^2, we sample over 25 h^-3 Gpc^3 (comoving) assuming the current LCDM cosmology. Over this redshift range, we find that the redshift-space correlation function, xi(s), is adequately fit by a single power-law, with s_{0}=5.95+/-0.45 h^-1 Mpc and \gamma_{s}=1.16+0.11-0.16 when fit over s=1-25 h^-1 Mpc. Using the projected correlation function we calculate the real-space correlation length, r_{0}=5.45+0.35-0.45 h^-1 Mpc and \gamma=1.90+0.04-0.03, over scales of rp=1-130 h^-1 Mpc. Dividing the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
